I don’t understand how anyone can seriously consider a caucus to be democratically or Constitutionally equivalent to a primary.
In Texas, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, correct? But the caucus vote went to Obamination, as it did in 12 of 13 other states.
A caucus is an exercise in public intimidation where voters “lobby each other”, as opposed to the Constitutional privilege of primary or general election voting, which of course takes place in private.
There have been complaints that the timing and location of caucuses favor more affluent voters who don’t work during the evening, and college students who like to shout at other people, which would certainly explain not only why the Obamacons have been so successful but also the reasons for the appalling tenor of their entries on public blogs.
All in all, the whole thing reeks of back room deals and the vilest kind of social class-based snobbery, wrapped in the sheep’s clothing of racial “tolerance”. If you don’t mind the mixed metaphor.