{"id":142,"date":"2004-06-11T06:27:25","date_gmt":"2004-06-11T11:27:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/wp\/?p=142"},"modified":"2004-06-11T06:27:25","modified_gmt":"2004-06-11T11:27:25","slug":"and-so-it-goes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/?p=142","title":{"rendered":"And So It Goes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Coincidentally, on the same day that one of my online matches and I had our first serious disagreement, CNN ran a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2004\/TECH\/internet\/06\/10\/bad.dates.reut\/index.html\" target=_blank\">story<\/a> about the limitations of Internet dating services.<\/p><p><!--more--><br \/>\nThese services have become such a phenomenon &#8211; 2 out of every 5 singles in the US used them last year &#8211; that there are now several dedicated websites offering reviews, comments and summaries of personal experiences:<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.datingsitesreviews.com, http:\/\/datingreviewsonline.com, and http:\/\/www.edatereview.com<br \/>\nThis cottage industry is making a few people rich, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.<br \/>\nThere&#8217;s also no question that some people do &#8220;get lucky&#8221; and winnow out a compatible person from the dozens or even hundreds of matches who have been more or less carefully selected based on supposedly scientific, psychometric criteria.<br \/>\nSo, I think these services are a good thing, at least for a few of us.<br \/>\nMy own experience has so far has been worthwhile, mostly because it&#8217;s confirmed some beliefs that other, more idealistic people have challenged through the years.<br \/>\nNo question about it, for all or at least a great majority of the men who join these services, it is absolutely a requirement that a woman be thin.<br \/>\nWhere this leads to a conflict in core values for me is that I&#8217;ve been looking for a relationship based on a solid friendship &#8211; and I&#8217;ve found that I simply can&#8217;t be friends with a man who puts that kind of importance on looks in potential romantic partners.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s as if I were to invite a Klansman or a Nazi into my inner circle of friends, both men and women, all of whom seem to feel as strongly about this as I do.  I can&#8217;t do it, and it makes me physically ill to even consider it.<br \/>\nAs I&#8217;ve written before in this blog, I have no problem if someone I thought was perfectly swell were to start falling in love with me and ask me to change some aspect of my appearance as a condition of our escalating our relationship from platonic to romantic.<br \/>\nI figure that&#8217;s one of many compromises a couple needs to make and on that basis, I&#8217;m &#8220;good&#8221; with it.<br \/>\nWhere I do have a problem is maybe a lack of imagination or trust implied in &#8220;wanting everything NOW&#8221;, failing to see potential in the evolution of something that starts off enriching your life through shared interests, communication, etc.  It&#8217;s a &#8220;Since you&#8217;re not perfect RIGHT NOW, I don&#8217;t want anything to do with you&#8221; attitude which precludes growth, change and accommodation.<br \/>\nPerhaps it&#8217;s a sign of lack of self-confidence &#8211; if a man truly doubts his own attractiveness, then he can&#8217;t see that a woman might want to make herself attractive to him.  Or maybe he doubts his own capacity for commitment, figuring that if she makes a &#8220;sacrifice&#8221;, he may be unworthy of it, or unwilling to put himself on the line if &#8220;things don&#8217;t work out&#8221;.<br \/>\nSo, the &#8220;looks&#8221; thing is a benchmark of sorts for weeding out those who are willing to embark on a long-term commitment, be it friendship or otherwise, from those who are &#8220;players&#8221;.<br \/>\nAnd THAT makes sense.  At least, to me it does.  And how do you measure something like that with a multiple choice questionnaire?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Coincidentally, on the same day that one of my online matches and I had our first serious disagreement, CNN ran a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecapeblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}